|
Posted on 10.09.08 by dancurry @ 8:55 pm
Today, Barack Obama decided to try out a few new answers about his alliance with unrepetent domestic terrorist Bill Ayers and may have contradicted his own chief spokesman. First, he told ABC anchor Charlie Gibson (D-Obama):
Nobody said he was involved in your campaign or an advisor. Those are red herrings. And, we are trying to determine how much he palled around with Ayers. That is unknown because to date Barack and Ayers haven’t answered it. On a radio interview, Obama tried a new approach:
Rehabilitated? This might contradict what his spokesman, David Axelrod said earlier in the week. He claimed Obama didn’t know about Ayers’ past when he met him. If the word “ultimately” is his dodge here, then the answer still makes no sense because there were articles in Chicago papers throughout the late 1980s stating that Ayers and his terrorist cohort wife Bernardine Dohrn were still unrepentant and not “rehabilitated” to many people, including the New York State Bar Association. This is getting more bizarre. Why can’t anyone in the media get a straight answer from Obama? Why hasn’t the Obama campaign pumped out a lengthy timeline on their alliance that would make this go away? Technorati Tags: |
