NOW endorses Hillary, sexual harassment
Posted on 12.06.07 by dancurry @ 9:53 pm

In a world that was logical, a group that claims to protect women wouldn’t be endorsing a presidential candidate who has a top donor accused by the federal government of “egregious” sexual harassment.

Not only did Hillary Clinton accept about $165,000 in campaign donations from business owner and accused sexual harasser John Burgess, she rode on his International Profit Associates jet and spoke at an IPA company function. All while the allegations were pending in U.S. District Court in Chicago.

None of that seems to bother the Illinois chapter of NOW, which proudly endorsed the sexual harassment enabler from New York, for her “long history of support for women’s empowerment.”

I wonder how empowered these women felt, as described by the EEOC’s pending lawsuit.

IPA’s management, led by John Burgess, created a culture at IPA where sexual harassment flourished. IPA’s senior managers harassed women with impunity, sending a signal to lower-level managers and employees that they could do the same. Given the tone set by IPA’s senior management, it is not surprising that sexual harassment at IPA was rampant in all departments and at all levels of the company. Women at IPA routinely had to endure a gauntlet of abuse, ranging from sexual solicitations and physical harassment, to sexual comments and offensive sexual materials. Based on the extensive record of harassment presented in this case, IPA is not entitled to a finding that as a matter of law, the sexual harassment that occurred at the company was insufficiently severe or pervasive to survive summary judgment.

Here’s what EEOC lawyer Diane Smason said about the case in a May 2006 story in the New York Times.

“This is probably the most egregious case of sex harassment that the Chicago district office has seen. The owner of the company (John Burgess) engaged in harassment, and that set the tone for the company, on down.”

The Chicago Tribune’s “Swamp” covered the endorsement and of course didn’t ask about the incongruity of a so-called women’s group endorsing a woman who embraces the support of John Burgess. I guess the reporter didn’t feel empowered enough to ask a tough question.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Filed under: Hillary and Mainstream media and National politics

&
Reverse Spin allows a former newspaper reporter, editor, government spokesman and long ago JFK Democrat turned Republican strategist to explain the weird and twisted things that are written and said every day...in Illinois...and across the country. Dan Curry can be reached at danieldcurry at gmail dot com. The opinions expressed here are correct and not always those of clients of my public affairs consulting company, Curry Public Strategies, Inc.

Main Menu
Home
6th District
Baseball
Blagojevich
Blogs
Cardinals
Hillary
Illinois politics
JFKvs.Dems
Mainstream media
National politics
Obama
Paris murders
Porter/Simon saga
Running
Tech
Topinka
Uncategorized



RSS feed

Search

  • Baseball

  • IllinoisMedia

  • IllinoisPolitics

  • NationalPolitics

  • Tech



  • Credits and Copyright
    Proudly powered by WordPress. All content © 2006 Dan Curry
    Theme by Theron Parlin

    Archives
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006


    Recent Entries