|
Posted on 10.27.08 by dancurry @ 7:28 pm
Certain liberal journalists have preened in print about Sarah Palin’s alleged lack of intelligence. One called her a “Grade A Dope.” Others have been even harsher. None, of course, have stood toe-to-toe with a veteran U.S. Senator and held their own in a debate, or flawlessly delivered a brilliant convention speech. Here’s what the former editor-in-chief of Ms. magazine, who has spent hours with Palin recently, said about her:
She went even further.
Palin will be a formidable force in national politics for years to come, if she chooses to pursue that path. Technorati Tags: |
|
Posted on 10.27.08 by dancurry @ 3:38 pm
Dean Barnett died today of cystic fibrosis at the age of 41. He was one of the best writers on the internet. I discovered him a couple of years ago and exchanged emails a few times. He wrote with an amazing clarity and optimistic introspection about his illness and joyfully about politics and baseball. I’d recommend perusing those writings at his original blog, Soxblog. He later wrote for Hugh Hewitt’s blog and for the Weekly Standard. May he rest in peace. Technorati Tags: |
|
Posted on 09.22.08 by dancurry @ 6:04 am
We in Illinois know Barack Obama is a faux reformer. He has never bucked his own party in a meaningful way. He has thrived during the most corrupt period in Illinois history and instead of standing up to it, he essentially went with the dirty flow, as this excellent book points out. In no particular order, here are 10 examples. 1. Governor Rod Blagojevich. At 13 percent approval he is the most unpopular governor in the country. For good reason—he’s probably the most corrupt. Since he took office in 2003 proclaiming he’d reform Illinois government, his administration has been an ethical and operational disaster. He’s facing a huge federal investigation into his cronyism and hiring practices. His number one and two outside advisors/fundraisers have been indicted and in Tony Rezko’s case, convicted. Obama has many many common advisors, supporters and donors with Blagojevich, including Rezko. Obama chaired a state senate committee that approved a health board consolidation that was crucial in allowing Rezko and pals to plunder state government. Never once during five years of this mushrooming corruption scandal has Obama criticized the governor. Contrast this with Obama’s predecessor, U.S. Senator Peter Fitzgerald, who sharply and publicly disagreed and moved to stop corruption under a governor of his own party under federal investigation during his tenure. That governor, George Ryan, has since gone to federal prison. Obama not only has refused to criticize Blagojevich, he has given him campaign assignments. 2. Tony Rezko-aided house deal. The news media has given Obama’s mansion deal spasmodic attention. Several burning questions remain about the June 2005 purchase of his Chicago south side mansion on the same day his influence peddler pal purchased the adjacent lot. After months of stonewalling, Obama has answered some questions about the sale, but has glaringly obscured the crux of the question—did he receive financial benefit from Rezko’s participation. He has released dozens of pages of documents related to the sale but not the most important one that lists all the money changing hands. We also haven’t heard from the sellers of the properties and the agents/brokers involved. There is strong circumstantial evidence that the Obamas received a financial benefit of up to hundreds of thousands of dollars from Rezko’s same day participation, which would be a blatant violation of Senate ethics rules, among other standards. Despite this, the media seems to have dropped its interest for some reason. 3. Mayor Richard Daley. Although much more popular than Governor Blagojevich, Daley’s administration also has had its share of corruption problems. A federal investigation into hiring practices has produced high profile indictments and is still underway. The heat produced by the probes even caused the media in Chicago to ask Obama about it and he offered mild concern, a micro-rebuke he withdrew within hours. Perhaps his main advisor, David Axelrod, who also advises Daley, straightened him out. Months earlier, Axelrod had written an op-ed in the Chicago Tribune defending Daley’s political patronage. Since then, Obama has been mum about Chicago corruption. 4. Anti-reform endorsement decisions. When Obama has been asked to make an endorsement that matters, he sides with self-interest over reform. Obama supporter Eric Zorn noted with disgust that Obama refused to side with reform in sitting out the 2006 Cook County Board President primary, effectively handing re-election to machine hack John Stroger over the reform-minded Forrest Claypool. Obama endorsed donor/banker Alexi Giannoulias over a downstate law enforcement official in the 2006 primary for state treasurer. Giannoulias’ family bank was accused of giving loans to mob figures and other unseemly practices. Obama’s high-profile TV ads for Alexi proved decisive in the race. Giannoulias has since become a presidential campaign bundler. Obama also made an unusual mayoral endorsement for suburban Aurora mayor Tom Weisner in 2005. Aurora’s lobbyist: Obama’s first political advisor, Dan Shomon. 5. Emil Jones. The longtime Illinois Senate president and Obama’s political godfather is by even the most generous characterization, an opponent of reform. Over the years, Jones has dished out the pork, hired his relatives, enjoyed the perks of government and frequently had his integrity questioned. In other words, another Chicago machine hack. Again, Obama has never stood up or spoke out about any of Jones escapades. 6. The Robert Blackwell Jr. caper. One of the most under mentioned items on Obama’s resume is the fishy legal contract he received from major donor Robert Blackwell Jr. As the Los Angeles Times reported, the contract gave Obama an $8,000-a-month contract for legal work that he refuses to detail. After the contract, Obama helped Blackwell receive state and federal grants for dubious projects and his wife was a key player in a minority contracting program at her hospital that netted Blackwell’s father a massive contract. 7. Slumlord/donors over constituents. The Chicago Sun-Times and Boston Globe have chronicled how Obama’s legislative actions as state senator directly helped his donor friends obtain government low-income housing assistance in his district and elsewhere. Subsequently, those donors, most prominently Rezko, skimmed profits and left Obama’s constituents without heat and other essentials. Obama was indifferent to it all—the complaints from residents, the failure by tenants, Rezko’s growing financial problems. Obama was plenty attentive, though, to the checks from Rezko that fueled his political campaigns. 8. The Iraq mysteries. Serious questions remain about the ties between Obama and Rezko associatiates Nadhmi Auchi, an Iraqi-born billionaire and Aiham Alsammarae, the former Iraqi power czar, both of whom have had serious problems with the law. Obama attended a dinner in Auchi’s honor at Rezko’s home in 2004. Three weeks before the Rezko-Obama house deal was finalized in June 2005, Auchi lent Rezko $3.5 million. At one point, Auchi enlisted Rezko to get his travel visa to the United States restored and the Rezko investigation he reached out to two Illinois officials. Obama has given vague denials it was him or his office. Alsammarae gave a Rezko-connected firm a $50 million contract for power plant security that Obama’s U.S. Senate office may have tried to revive after it was killed. He also posted part of Rezko’s bond. Obama has only barely trickled answers out on these matters and the mainstream press has given this explosive arena very little attention. 9. Secrecy and harassment. Obama has created the illusion of transparency through support of some no-brainer measures and then locked the door on many of his own documents. He won’t turn over his Illinois state senate records, the main document related to his house purchase with Rezko, his complete medical records, his college transcripts, his law license application, the client list of his main advisor, his U.S. Senate email records and so on. He also harasses critics, telling his supporters to smear legitimate authors and researchers who dare level any information that differs from his self-created narrative. 10. A 1998 state ethics bill canard. Obama’s supporters continually point to Obama’s sponsorship of a 1998 ethics law in Illinois as proof of his concern for reform. The reality is the bill passed 52-4 and was tepid, inching Illinois regulations a bit closer to the rest of states but leaving it far behind most. Regardless, the larger point is this: The law had virtually no effect on preventing corruption in Illinois. To the contrary, the law went into effect at the onset of perhaps the most corrupt period in Illinois history, an era that saw the indictment and conviction of a governor, the likely indictment of his successor, and plentiful indictments and convictions in city and state offices. Far more important than a milquetoast law, Illinois needed politicians to courageously speak out against the corruption bubbling around them. Technorati Tags: |
|
Posted on 09.05.08 by dancurry @ 7:48 pm
With a renewed vigor to smear Sarah Palin, the left-leaning news media and blogosphere continues to misfire in its attempt to explore her past. The Chicago Tribune today, the hometown paper that couldn’t even find a major failure on Barack Obama’s resume after millions of words of profiles, uncovers the scoop that the Alaskan state plane was not actually sold on eBay! Of course, Palin never said it did.
But she hinted it did, opine the Trib vetters.
The plane, after not selling on eBay, sold through a broker. Taxpayers in Alaska were $2.1 million richer as a result. So, there’s no story whatsoever. CNN picked up the sinister eBay scandal and interviewed the star of “Troopergate,” a story that was exposed as a pile of nothing with the interview of the aggrieved “victim” of Governor Palin’s “abuse of power,” a trooper who admitted on camera he tasered his 11-year-old son, illegally shot a moose, and looked to be lying on camera when he denied threatening the Palin family. Elsewhere, establishment media queen bee Sally Quinn apologized for disparaging Palin before her speech Wednesday night. As a true member of the “herd,” she is hedging her bets in case this Palin thing is for real. On the blogs, our very own Archpundit, usually a careful fellow compared to his liberal brethren, went into full supermarket tablet mode with the hints that an attempt to seal the court file by Todd Palin’s business partner portended a Jack Ryan like sex scandal. In anticipation, he even posted a chronology of the Jack Ryan affair. By nightfall, his hopes were dashed. The fact that he believed an open court file with that kind of bombshell would have been missed by the Alaska press says a lot about the contempt some liberals have for small town America. Please keep it up. You are assuring a Republican victory in November. Technorati Tags: |
|
Posted on 09.01.08 by dancurry @ 1:46 pm
How is it that the Chicago Tribune, Chicago Sun-Times and other major media outlets breathlessly covering Barack Obama’s every move the last two years failed to mention the only item on his resume that qualifies as executive experience? For nearly five years starting in 1995, Obama was chairman of the board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a foundation that handed out $115 million in education “reform” grants that resulted in exactly zero student improvement according to its own post-analysis. A search of Tribune and Sun-Times stories, including numerous major profiles, have whitewashed Annenberg from Obama’s past. Obama himself dropped Annenberg from his resume but it’s not hard to find it back in the mid-1990s when he was starting his political career and touting the post. The founder of the grant was unrepentent terrorist Bill Ayers, who, along with his wife, another unrepetent terrorist, Bernadine Dohrn, hosted a fundraiser to kick off Obama’s political career. That relationship was criticized in a devastating TV ad by the independent group American Issues Project. Only after respected conservative academic/researcher Stanley Kurtz and a few others started looking at the CAC did the sleepy MSM start to pay attention. The media covered the flap over whether the CAC records would remain sealed at Ayers’ school, the University of Illinois-Chicago, and quickly waved off the public by saying there were no “smoking guns” in the documents. Chicago Tribune’s liberal columnist/blogger Eric Zorn took the Obama campaign to task for sliming Kurtz and asking supporters to jam phone lines for Kurtz’s appearance on WGN-720 long-running and academic-oriented talk show hosted by University of Chicago professor Milt Rosenberg. But Zorn added that Rosenberg was wrong for scheduling Kurtz at all. If I were Rosenberg, I’d ask Zorn why his newspaper failed to once mention this significant item on Obama’s resume in the millions of words they’ve produced on the world’s most famous liberal. Would the newspaper have ignored a conservative candidate’s service on a foundation board that handed out mostly conservative grants and whose founder was a right wing terrorist who would be in prison for life except for prosecutorial misconduct? Just asking. It’s unclear whether the Trib was incompetent or just biased in failing to note the Annenberg connection. Two 2008 stories on the Ayers failed to note the link. On April 24, the paper published, “Questions and Answers About Bill Ayers.” (No link available).
Another Tribune story on Ayers this year failed to mention Annenberg.
The liberal media establishment in Chicago is feebly attempting to quash the Ayers uproar partly because it doesn’t understand the concern about Ayers and because it looks foolish for failing to note the Obama/Annenberg/Ayers chapter in its creation of the Obama fairy tale. Keep in mind that school reform has been a big issue in the Chicago media over the years, so Obama’s stewardship of that grant program definitely is relevant to understanding his past. Former Sun-Times reporter and left-wing education reformer Linda Lenz wrote a pathetic rebuttal in the Sun-Times where she noted that Chicago reporters were embarassed they were being asked to look into the matter because of legitimate questions raised by conservative journalists.
She proceeds to cheap shot Kurtz, a Ph. D. in social anthropology from Harvard University and a Senior Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, by referring to him simply as a “blogger.” There are two points here. (Blogger) Obama was head of a significant enterprise that incompetently handed out money, perhaps to cronies. It isn’t a good advertisement on his administrative leadership skills, which is important because he has no other such experience. (Please, don’t suggest running a successful campaign is a harbinger of competent governance; Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich ran two successful governor campaigns and is the most inept governor in the country). The second point is the Ayers connection. Liberals in the Chicago establishment might never understand it, but decent people across America don’t associate with unrepetent terrorists and wouldn’t if the opportunity presented itself. Even among journalists, there is recognition that the issue has force. Tribune researcher Brenda Kilianski, earlier this year, wrote an op-ed that expressed disgust at the media’s whitewashing of Ayers’ past.
The Tribune needs to ask itself why it continues to downplay and even ignore Barack Obama’s association with a man who, but for prosecutorial mistakes, probably would still be in prison today and has no regrets about his terrorist acts. Technorati Tags: |
|
Posted on 08.25.08 by dancurry @ 8:08 am
Joe Biden’s ties to the Tony Rezko scandal were reported on in the last 24 hours by the Chicago Tribune, Chicago Sun-Times, and Daily Herald. The accounts focused on Joe Cari, a longtime Democratic fundraiser.
Another angle to the story is David Wilhelm. The former DNC chairman and Bill Clinton campaign manager was a key advisor to Biden’s 1988 and 2008 campaign run. Wilhelm also is a longtime confident of Barack Obama’s senior strategist David Axelrod. As I wrote previously, the news media has curiously failed to ask Wilhelm questions about his role in the Rezko scandal in Illinois, dubbed Operation Board Games. His firm was subpoenaed after taking a no-bid pension contract from the Teachers’ Retirement System, the agency where a significant portion of the Rezko related fraud was centered. He was campaign chairman in 2002 for Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, whose administration is so entwined in Operation Board Games the DNC won’t allow him to speak at the convention this week. The Rezko scandal centered on funneling money to Blagojevich’s campaign fund, and Wilhelm served as the captain of that ship when it raised much of its money. Then, suddenly, as the Blagojevich investigations heated up, Wilhelm moved back to his native Ohio, denying the move had anything to do with the prosecutorial atmosphere in Illinois. That was two years ago. At the very least, you would think the media would ask him if he’s been questioned by the feds about Operation Board Games. Technorati Tags: |
|
Posted on 08.18.08 by dancurry @ 7:46 am
Jill Stanek and others have been pushing Barack Obama to give a straight answer on his votes in the Illinois senate on “Born Alive” legislation. Obama, as do all pro-choice politicians, is used to giving responses on abortion that are unresponsive to the question, knowing that the pro-choice news media will cover for them. Here, however, Stanek and company have caught the Obama campaign in a big lie. A big lie that I predict the Obama fawning news media will try to ignore. Technorati Tags: |
|
Posted on 03.03.08 by dancurry @ 9:46 pm
Aaron Watson at Free Will believes I’m wrong, that Barack Obama’s biggest vulnerability is his link through Tony Rezko to Nadhmi Auchi, the British billionaire and former Iraqi.
Don’t know if Barack knew much about Auchi, although it is difficult to know for sure. Barack left the press in a snit this evening after arguing over his “openness” on his Rezko ties. Contrast that with John McCain, who patiently answered every question after the New York Times smear article a few weeks ago. Technorati Tags: |
|
Posted on 03.02.08 by dancurry @ 10:24 am
Another 60 Minutes hit job on the George W. Bush administration—this one against Karl Rove—is being exposed as a fraud. The influential Power Line blog, written by experienced lawyers, not shreiking political wingnuts, is taking the show apart in methodical fashion. The same blog was instrumental in exposing the 2004 fake memos fiasco that ended Dan Rather’s career. First Scott Johnson took a whack at the story. Then, John Hinderaker, in great detail, shows that the person 60 Minutes relied upon for the most explosive charges is either lying or unstable.
Gateway Pundit was the early leader in exposing this story and has a thorough rundown here. UPDATE: John Hinderaker discusses his findings in a radio interview. Technorati Tags: |
|
Posted on 02.27.08 by dancurry @ 9:18 pm
A surge of defeatism wafted over my blog today when I dared to say violence is declining in Iraq. Never mind that a person who many in Illinois politics know—Phil O’Connor—is a direct eyewitness. And what about the chart below? Does the left really want to argue that there’s hasn’t been dramatic decreases in violence in Iraq? I hereby invite Barack Obama to employ this strategy. Technorati Tags: |
| previous posts » |
